Fechar

%0 Journal Article
%4 urlib.net/www/2022/02.08.10.55
%2 urlib.net/www/2022/02.08.10.55.41
%@issn 0006-3207
%T The risk of fake controversies for Brazilian environmental policies
%D 2022
%9 journal article
%A Rajão, Raoni,
%A Nobre, Antonio Donato,
%A Cunha, Evandro L. T. P.,
%A Duarte, Tiago Ribeiro,
%A Marcolino, Camilla,
%A Soares Filho, Britaldo,
%A Spavorek, Gerd,
%A Rodrigues, Ricardo R.,
%A Valera, Carlos,
%A Bustamante, Mercedes,
%A Nobre, Carlos Afonso,
%A Lima, Letícia Santos de,
%@affiliation Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
%@affiliation Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)
%@affiliation Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
%@affiliation Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
%@affiliation Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
%@affiliation Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
%@affiliation Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
%@affiliation Universidade de São Paulo (USP)
%@affiliation Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)
%@affiliation Universidade de Brasília (UnB)
%@affiliation Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)
%@affiliation Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (UFMG)
%@electronicmailaddress rajao@ufmg.br
%@electronicmailaddress anobre27@gmail.com
%B Biological Conservation
%V 266
%P e109447
%K Brazilian Forest Code, Contrarians, Denialism, Environmental policy-making in Brazil, Environmental public policy, False controversies in science.
%X Fake controversies have influenced policy making on health and environmental issues for decades, resulting in major implementation setbacks worldwide. As a case study, in this paper we examine fake controversies produced by a small group of active Brazilian researchers that have seriously impacted environmental conservation, particularly in issues related to deforestation and climate change. Based on the literature, we develop a typology of strategies deployed in fake controversies, which include manufacturing uncertainty, misusing scientific credentials, and disregarding scientific literature. Afterwards, we examine the influence of this group of contrarians at the National Congress. We then analyze the fake controversies promoted by these contrarians and argue that, to properly understand them, we need to consider a strategy so far overlooked in the literature: the manufacture of pseudo-facts, namely, affirmations at odds with the established literature but that strives to appear as scientific facts. Unlike other contexts, in which contrarians have mainly sought to cast doubt on consensual issues by arguing that there are still considerable uncertainties surrounding them, in Brazil pseudo-facts on deforestation have been produced and published outside the peer-reviewed literature. We conclude the study with recommendations on how to oppose fake scientific controversies that threaten environmental conservation in general.
%@language en
%3 rajao_2022_fake.pdf


Fechar