@Article{HerdiesSGSGCLRKSMM:2023:EvSuDa,
author = "Herdies, Dirceu Luis and Silva, Fabricio Daniel dos Santos and
Gomes, Helber Barros and Silva, Maria Cristina Lemos da and Gomes,
Heliofabio Barros and Costa, Rafaela Lisboa and Lins, Mayara
Christine Correia and Reis, Jean Souza dos and Kubota, Paulo
Yoshio and Souza, Dayana Castilho de and Melo, Maria Luciene Dias
de and Mariano, Glauber Lopes",
affiliation = "{Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and
{Universidade Federal de Alagoas (UFAL)} and {Universidade Federal
de Alagoas (UFAL)} and {Universidade Federal de Alagoas (UFAL)}
and {Universidade Federal de Alagoas (UFAL)} and {Universidade
Federal de Alagoas (UFAL)} and {Universidade Federal de Alagoas
(UFAL)} and {Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)}
and {Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and
{Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and
{Universidade Federal de Alagoas (UFAL)} and {Universidade Federal
de Alagoas (UFAL)}",
title = "Evaluation of surface data simulation performance with the
Brazilian Global Atmospheric Model (BAM)",
journal = "Atmosphere",
year = "2023",
volume = "14",
number = "1",
pages = "e125",
month = "Jan.",
keywords = "climate model evaluation, BAM-v2, 2, 1, solar radiation,
temperature, wind speed.",
abstract = "In this study, we evaluated the performance of the Brazilian
Global Atmospheric Model (BAM), in its version 2.2.1, in the
representation of the surface variables solar radiation,
temperature (maximum, minimum, and average), and wind speed. Three
experiments were carried out for the period from 2016 to 2022
under three different aerosol conditions (constant (CTE),
climatological (CLIM), and equal to zero (ZERO)), discarding the
first year as a spin-up period. The observations came from a
high-resolution gridded analysis that provides Brazil with robust
data based on observations from surface stations on a daily scale
from 1961 to 2020; therefore, combining the BAM outputs with the
observations, our intercomparison period took place from 2017 to
2020, for three timescales: daily, 10-day average, and monthly,
targeting different applications. In its different simulations,
BAM overestimated solar radiation throughout Brazil, especially in
the Amazon; underestimated temperature in most of the northeast,
southeast, and south regions; and overestimated in parts of the
north and mid-west; while wind speed was only not overestimated in
the Amazon region. In relative terms, the simulations with
constant aerosol showed better performance than the others,
followed by climatological conditions and zero aerosol. The
dexterity indices applied in the intercomparison between BAM and
observations indicate that BAM needs adjustments and calibration
to better represent these surface variables. Where model
deficiencies have been identified, these can be used to drive
model development and further improve the predictive
capabilities.",
doi = "10.3390/atmos14010125",
url = "http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/atmos14010125",
issn = "2073-4433",
language = "en",
targetfile = "atmosphere-14-00125.pdf",
urlaccessdate = "23 maio 2024"
}