@InProceedings{BidegainCami:2006:PeGCCl,
author = "Bidegain, Mario and Camilloni, Ines",
affiliation = "{Universidad de la Republica - URUGUAY} and {Universidad de Buenos
Aires - ARGENTINA}",
title = "Performance of GCMs and Climate Future Scenarios for Southeastern
South America",
booktitle = "Proceedings...",
year = "2006",
editor = "Vera, Carolina and Nobre, Carlos",
pages = "223--226",
organization = "International Conference on Southern Hemisphere Meteorology and
Oceanography, 8. (ICSHMO).",
publisher = "American Meteorological Society (AMS)",
address = "45 Beacon Hill Road, Boston, MA, USA",
keywords = "Climate Change scenarios, performance of GCMs, Southeastern South
America.",
abstract = "In order to evaluate the differences between the observed climate
and the climate simulations with Global Climate Models (GCMs), in
the Southeastern South America region, we selected six available
runs from IPCC Distribution Data Center, using socioeconomic
SRES-A2 and B2 forcing scenario. The models are: HadCM3,
ECHAM4/OPYC3, CGCM2, NCAR-PCM1, GFDL R30 and CSIRO Mark 2. We have
compared sea level pressure, surface air temperature and
precipitation from the models, against gridded observed climate
fields (University of Delaware and NCAR reanalysis), trying to
estimate regional performance of the control simulations (baseline
climate scenarios). We assume that the models that better simulate
the current regional climate in their control experiments are
likely to be more reliable in their simulations of regional
climate under changes of greenhouse gases concentrations. The
comparison between the monthly and annual SLP fields shows that
only four models (HADCM3, CSIRO-mk2, ECHAM4, GFDL-R30) have an
acceptable agreement with the observed SLP field and are able to
represent the position and intensity of the pressure systems and
the annual cycle. This agreement is a little poor in the austral
winter months (July to September) and show good correlation with
observed values during the austral summer (December to March).
Comparison for precipitation was performed only for the four
models with best agreement in the SLP fields: HADCM3,
ECHAM4/OPYC3, CSIRO-mk2 and GFDL-R30. In all cases, precipitation
is largely underestimated in the R{\'{\i}}o de la Plata basin.
The comparison between the monthly and annual temperature fields
shows that in general all the models have an acceptable agreement
with the observed fields, but the common feature of the models is
that they overestimate over the same continental areas were
underestimate precipitation (northeastern Argentina and southern
Brazil). The future climate change scenarios, for precipitation
and temperature, over Southern cone of South America were
constructed for 2020s, 2050s and 2080s, estimated by HADCM3 and
ECHAM4 models forced by SRES A2 and B2 socioeconomic scenario..",
conference-location = "Foz do Igua{\c{c}}u",
conference-year = "24-28 Apr. 2006",
language = "en",
organisation = "American Meteorological Society (AMS)",
ibi = "cptec.inpe.br/adm_conf/2005/10.31.12.50",
url = "http://urlib.net/ibi/cptec.inpe.br/adm_conf/2005/10.31.12.50",
targetfile = "223-226.pdf",
type = "Climate change in the SH",
urlaccessdate = "29 jun. 2024"
}