@InProceedings{MedeirosCastErthDutr:2011:ClImMé,
author = "Medeiros, Ivo Paix{\~a}o de and Castro Filho, Carlos Alberto
Pires de and Erthal, Guaraci Jos{\'e} and Dutra, Luciano Vieira",
affiliation = "{Instituto Tecnol{\'o}gico da Aeron{\'a}utica - ITA} and
{Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais - INPE} and {Instituto
Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais - INPE} and {Instituto Nacional de
Pesquisas Espaciais - INPE}",
title = "Classifica{\c{c}}{\~a}o de imagens pelo m{\'e}todo de
{\'A}rvore de Decis{\~a}o Obl{\'{\i}}qua",
booktitle = "Anais...",
year = "2011",
editor = "Epiphanio, Jos{\'e} Carlos Neves and Galv{\~a}o, L{\^e}nio
Soares",
pages = "4255--4262",
organization = "Simp{\'o}sio Brasileiro de Sensoriamento Remoto, 15. (SBSR).",
publisher = "Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)",
address = "S{\~a}o Jos{\'e} dos Campos",
keywords = "pattern recognition, classification, decision tree, reconhecimento
de padr{\~o}es.",
abstract = "The Oblique Decision Tree (ODT) classification method has the
advantage of dividing feature spaces using multidimensional
hyperplanes that are oblique to the Cartesian axes. Because it is
a non-parametric classification method, it also is capable of
classifying images containing different statistical distribution.
This paper aims to present a model of an ODT and perform tests
comparing its classification results with other traditional
classification methods. The ODT developed is binary and uses the
Exchange Method for splitting each node into two subsets of
classes, along with Fisher´s Linear Discriminant to calculate the
parameters for the hyperplanes. Tests have been done using
Polarimetric Interferometric and Synthetic Aperture Radar data
from the brazilian Terrestrial Cartography Subproject, also known
as Amazon Radiography, of the Geographic Service of Brazilian Army
(DSG). Throughout the tests the ODT showed slightly better
classification results compared to the Ordinary Binary
Classification Tree, obtaining better overall accuracy (86.06%)
and smaller tree. Besides that, the ODT showed better results than
those obtained with traditional classifiers such as the Maximum
Likelihood (85.44%), Nearest Neighbor (77.07%) and Mahalanobis
Distance (78.72%). In the other hand, the Support Vector Machine
classification method obtained higher overall accuracy (87.37%)
although a much higher processing time is needed.",
conference-location = "Curitiba",
conference-year = "30 abr. - 5 maio 2011",
isbn = "{978-85-17-00056-0 (Internet)} and {978-85-17-00057-7 (DVD)}",
language = "pt",
organisation = "Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)",
ibi = "3ERPFQRTRW/39UFKJE",
url = "http://urlib.net/ibi/3ERPFQRTRW/39UFKJE",
targetfile = "p0953.pdf",
type = "Processamento de Imagens",
urlaccessdate = "15 jun. 2024"
}