@InProceedings{GrisDalMouRosFlo:2017:PrDaEs,
author = "Gris, Diego Jose and Dalmolin, Ricardo Sim{\~a}o Diniz and
Moura-Bueno, Jean Michel and Rosin, Nicolas Augusto and Flores,
Jo{\~a}o Pedro Moro",
title = "Pr{\'e}-processamento dos dados de espectroscopia na regi{\~a}o
do Vis-NIR melhoram a predi{\c{c}}{\~a}o do carbono
org{\^a}nico do solo?",
booktitle = "Anais...",
year = "2017",
editor = "Gherardi, Douglas Francisco Marcolino and Arag{\~a}o, Luiz
Eduardo Oliveira e Cruz de",
pages = "6304--6311",
organization = "Simp{\'o}sio Brasileiro de Sensoriamento Remoto, 18. (SBSR)",
publisher = "Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)",
address = "S{\~a}o Jos{\'e} dos Campos",
abstract = "Soil is one of the most important carbon (C) reservoirs in the
environment, acting as a sink or source of C to the atmosphere,
depending on its management. Therefore, data on soil organic
carbon (SOC) is important for managing C in the ecosystem, but
traditional methods for mapping SOC are highly demanding in time
and resources. In this scenario, diffuse reflectance spectroscopy
(DRS) emerges as a more efficient technique for SOC assessment.
This study evaluates preprocessing techniques for soil spectra and
models for SOC prediction. The study was conducted at Giru{\'a},
State of Rio Grande do Sul (RS), Brazil, where 841 soil samples
were collected at 261 sites, in an area of 940 ha. SOC was
determined analytically through wet combustion. Soil spectra were
obtained using a FieldSpec Pro spectroradiometer. Preprocessing
techniques included: smoothing (SMO), continuum removal (CRR),
standard normal variate (SNV), detrend (DET), Savitzky-Golay first
derivative (SGD), and Savitzky-Golay first derivative after
transformation to absorbance (ASG). The samples were divided in
training (70%) and validation (30%) sets. Two models were tested
for SOC prediction: partial least squares regression (PLSR) and
random forest (RF). SMO was the best preprocessing technique for
PLSR, while SGD performed best for RF. PLSR had the best
performance for SOC prediction (Rv2 = 0.72; RMSEv = 0.52% and
RPIQv = 2.23) when compared to RF (Rv2 = 0.71; RMSEv = 0.53% and
RPIQv = 2.20).",
conference-location = "Santos",
conference-year = "28-31 maio 2017",
isbn = "978-85-17-00088-1",
label = "59674",
language = "pt",
organisation = "Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)",
ibi = "8JMKD3MGP6W34M/3PSMCLB",
url = "http://urlib.net/ibi/8JMKD3MGP6W34M/3PSMCLB",
targetfile = "59674.pdf",
type = "Solos e umidade do solo",
urlaccessdate = "16 jun. 2024"
}