@InProceedings{GodinhoArMoCaSiSh:2021:CoPoFi,
author = "Godinho, Cassol Henrique Luis and Arag{\~a}o, Luiz Eduardo
Oliveira e Cruz de and Moraes, Elisabete Caria and Carreiras,
Jo{\~a}o Manuel Brito and Silva, Camila Val{\'e}ria Jesus and
Shimabukuro, Yosio Edemir",
affiliation = "{Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {Instituto
Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {Instituto Nacional de
Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {University of Sheffield} and
{Lancaster University} and {Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas
Espaciais (INPE)}",
title = "Comparison of polarimetric filters to retrieve forest biomass",
booktitle = "Proceedings...",
year = "2021",
organization = "International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS)",
publisher = "IEEE",
address = "Breussels",
keywords = "Amazon, Polarimetry, ALOS/PALSAR, -, 2, Aboveground Biomass,
Speckle.",
abstract = "There are several polarimetric filters in the literature developed
for the most diverse applications. Here, we present an evaluation
of different filter sizes and types for improving the AGB
estimates in the Brazilian Amazon , varying from none to 21x21 p x
filter size in full polarimetric ALOS/PALSAR - 2. The optimal
window size was chosen by the highest coefficient of determination
( Rē) between forest AGB and backscattering coefficient (
\σ0 ). After that, six polarimetric filters were evaluated:
BoxCar, Refined Lee, Improved Sigma Lee, Intensity Driven Adaptive
Neighbourhood (IDAN), Scattering Model -Based (SMB), and Model
-based (MB). The comparison criterion was a set of statistics
aimed at preserving the three basic principles of the filtering
process. The optimal window size was 11 x11 px. The best was
Refined Lee, followed by BoxCar and SMB. The Rē differences in the
filter choice can be up to 15% for retrieving forest AGB.",
conference-location = "Online",
conference-year = "12-16 July",
language = "en",
targetfile = "godinho_2021.pdf",
urlaccessdate = "04 jun. 2024"
}