@Article{HodnettVenMarOyaTom:1997:FlWaTa,
author = "Hodnett, M. G. and Vendrame, I. and Marques Filho, A. de O. and
Oyama, M. D. and Tomasella, Javier",
affiliation = "{CPTEC-INPE-Cachoeira Paulista-12630-000-SP-Brasil}",
title = "Soil water storage and groundwater behaviour in a catenary
sequence beneath forest in central Amazonia. II. Floodplain water
table behaviour and implications for streamflow generation",
journal = "Hydrology and Earth System Sciences",
year = "1997",
volume = "1",
number = "2",
pages = "279--290",
month = "may/jun",
keywords = "soil storage, caternary sequence, water table.",
abstract = "Abstract Valley floor groundwater level data collected during the
ABRACOS project (Gash et al. 1996), and published streamflow data
from small forested catchments in geomorphologically similar areas
nearby have been analysed to improve the understanding of the
processes of streamflow generation. Early in the wet season, the
floodplain water table is typically at 0.8 m depth, or less, and
receives only local, vertical recharge. Large storms may create a
groundwater ridge beneath the floodplain, temporarily creating a
gradient in the direction of the hilislope. Later in the wet
season, floodpiain water levels are controlled primarily by the
discharge of groundwater which maintains the dry season
streamflow. The groundwater is recharged by deep drainage from
beneath the plateau and slope areas once the dry season soil water
deficit has been overcome. In the late wet season, the water level
is almost at the floodplain surface and may create seeps on the
lower slopes in very wet years. For the period 1966-1989, the
recharge was estimated to range from 290 mm to 1601 mm with a mean
of 1087 mm. Published data show that baseflow is 91% of annual
runoff. Stormflow is generated on the floodplain, and water table
recessions after rainfall events show that the runoff response
depends on the depth to the water table. These results are from
areas with deeply weathered and permeable soils; in areas of
Amazonia with shallower soils, the predominant flow generation
processes will differ (Elsenbeer and Lack, 1996).",
copyholder = "SID/SCD",
issn = "1027-5606",
language = "en",
targetfile = "Hodnett_Soil water_II_Floodp.pdf",
urlaccessdate = "23 maio 2024"
}