@MastersThesis{Paula:2022:CoEfTo,
               author = "Paula, Elaine de Souza Ferreira de",
                title = "Compara{\c{c}}{\~a}o das efici{\^e}ncias das topologias PPT e 
                         DET n{\~a}o reguladas por modelagem, simula{\c{c}}{\~a}o e 
                         an{\'a}lise de subsistemas de energia el{\'e}trica para pequenos 
                         sat{\'e}lites",
               school = "Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)",
                 year = "2022",
              address = "S{\~a}o Jos{\'e} dos Campos",
                month = "2022-01-19",
             keywords = "subsistema de energia el{\'e}trica-EPS, efici{\^e}ncia, 
                         rastreador de pot{\^e}ncia de pico-PPT, transfer{\^e}ncia direta 
                         de energia-DET, painel solar, electrical power subsystem - EPS, 
                         efficiency, peak power tracking - PPT, direct energy transfer - 
                         DET, solar array.",
             abstract = "As principais tarefas do Subsistema de Energia El{\'e}trica 
                         (Electrical Power Subsystem-EPS) de um sat{\'e}lite artificial 
                         s{\~a}o gerar, armazenar e fornecer a energia necess{\'a}ria 
                         {\`a}s cargas {\'u}teis, regulando, controlando e distribuindo a 
                         energia gerada pelos pain{\'e}is solares e armazenada pelas 
                         baterias. A escolha de uma topologia EPS eficiente e um controle 
                         de gerenciamento de energia eficaz s{\~a}o elementos cruciais 
                         para o sucesso da miss{\~a}o e uma longa vida {\'u}til dos 
                         sat{\'e}lites. No in{\'{\i}}cio de seu projeto, {\'e} 
                         importante verificar o cumprimento de alguns requisitos, 
                         principalmente de efici{\^e}ncia, por meio de Modelos e 
                         Simula{\c{c}}{\~o}es (M\&S) dos pain{\'e}is solares, baterias 
                         e conversores, e a an{\'a}lise de seus resultados. Assim, este 
                         trabalho, apresenta, o estudo comparativo, segundo um 
                         crit{\'e}rio de efici{\^e}ncia, avaliando a efici{\^e}ncia 
                         geral do sistema, para duas classes de topologias: 
                         Transfer{\^e}ncia Direta de Energia (Direct Energy Transfer-DET) 
                         e Rastreador de Pot{\^e}ncia de Pico (Peak Power Tracking-PPT), 
                         em barramento n{\~a}o regulado, de Subsistemas de Energia 
                         El{\'e}trica para sat{\'e}lites artificiais, comparando a 
                         energia dissipada em cada um deles ao longo do per{\'{\i}}odo 
                         orbital via modelagem, simula{\c{c}}{\~a}o e an{\'a}lise. Os 
                         resultados sugerem que: 1) a topologia PPT {\'e} mais eficiente 
                         que a topologia DET; 2) a M\&S adotada e as an{\'a}lises 
                         realizadas os validam como ferramenta para avaliar o requisito de 
                         efici{\^e}ncia do EPS. ABSTRACT: The main tasks of the Electrical 
                         Power Subsystem (EPS) of an artificial satellite are to generate, 
                         store and supply the necessary energy to the payloads, by 
                         regulating, controlling and distributing the energy generated by 
                         the solar panels and stored by the batteries. Choosing an 
                         efficient EPS topology and an effective power management control 
                         are crucial elements for mission success and long satellite life. 
                         Early in their design, it is important to verify the compliance of 
                         some requirements, especially on efficiency, via Models and 
                         Simulations (M\&S) of the solar panels, batteries and converters, 
                         and the analysis of their results. So, this work presents the 
                         comparative study, according to an efficiency criterion, 
                         evaluating the system overall efficiency, for two classes of 
                         topologies: Direct Energy Transfer (DET) and Peak Power Tracking 
                         (PPT), in unregulated bus, of Electrical Power Subsystems for 
                         artificial satellites, by comparing the energy dissipated for each 
                         of them along the orbital period via modeling, simulation and 
                         analysis. The results obtained so far suggest that: 1) PPT 
                         topology is more efficient than DET topology; 2) the adopted M\&S 
                         and the analysis performed validate them as a tool to assess the 
                         EPS efficiency requirement.",
            committee = "Santos, Walter Abrah{\~a}o dos (presidente) and Souza, Marcelo 
                         Lopes de Oliveira e (orientador) and Rabello, Ana Paula de S{\'a} 
                         Santos and Santos, Willer Gomes dos",
         englishtitle = "Comparison of efficiency of unregulated PPT and DET topologies by 
                         modeling, simulation and analysis of electric power subsystems for 
                         small satellites",
             language = "pt",
                pages = "198",
                  ibi = "8JMKD3MGP3W34T/465KKTE",
                  url = "http://urlib.net/ibi/8JMKD3MGP3W34T/465KKTE",
           targetfile = "publicacao.pdf",
        urlaccessdate = "25 jun. 2024"
}