@Article{RosanSiMeHeFiAr:2022:FrDiTr,
author = "Rosan, Thais M. and Sitch, Stephen and Mercado, Lina. M. and
Heinrich, Viola and Firedlingstein, Pierre and Arag{\~a}o, Luiz
Eduardo Oliveira e Cruz de",
affiliation = "{University of Exeter} and {University of Exeter} and {University
of Exeter} and {University of Bristol} and {University of Exeter}
and {Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)}",
title = "Fragmentation-Driven Divergent Trends in Burned Area in Amazonia
and Cerrado",
journal = "Frontiers in Forests and Global Change",
year = "2022",
volume = "5",
pages = "e801408",
month = "Feb.",
keywords = "Amazonia, burned area fraction, Cerrado, fire, land use
management, landscape fragmentation.",
abstract = "The two major Brazilian biomes, the Amazonia and the Cerrado
(savanna), are increasingly exposed to fires. The Amazonian Forest
is a fire sensitive ecosystem where fires are a typically rare
disturbance while the Cerrado is naturally fire-dependent. Human
activities, such as landscape fragmentation and land-use
management, have modified the fire regime of the Cerrado and
introduced fire into the Amazonian Forest. There is limited
understanding of the role of landscape fragmentation on fire
occurrence in the Amazonia and Cerrado biomes. Due to differences
in vegetation structure, composition, and land use characteristics
in each biome, we hypothesize that the emerging burned area (BA)
patterns will result from biome-specific fire responses to
fragmentation. The aim of this study was to test the general
relationship between BA, landscape fragmentation, and agricultural
land in the Amazonia and the Cerrado biomes. To estimate the
trends and status of landscape fragmentation a Forest Area Density
(FAD) index was calculated based on the MapBiomas land cover
dataset for both biomes between 2002 and 2018. BA fraction was
analyzed within native vegetation against the FAD and agricultural
land fraction. Our results showed an increase in landscape
fragmentation across 16% of Amazonia and 15% of Cerrado. We
identified an opposite relationship between BA fraction, and
landscape fragmentation and agricultural fraction contrasting the
two biomes. For Amazonia, both landscape fragmentation and
agricultural fraction increased BA fraction due to an increase of
human ignition activities. For the Cerrado, on the other hand, an
increase in landscape fragmentation and agricultural fraction
caused a decrease in BA fraction within the native vegetation. For
both biomes, we found that during drought years BA increases
whilst the divergent trends driven by fragmentation in the two
contrasting global biomes is maintained. This understanding will
be critical to informing the representation of fire dynamics in
fire-enable Dynamic Global Vegetation Models and Earth System
Models for climate projection and future ecosystem service
provision.",
doi = "10.3389/ffgc.2022.801408",
url = "http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2022.801408",
issn = "2624-893X",
language = "en",
targetfile = "ffgc-05-801408.pdf",
urlaccessdate = "29 jun. 2024"
}