@Article{VieiraQueiShig:2022:AnInNu,
author = "Vieira, Leonardo de Souza and Queiroz, Gilberto Ribeiro de and
Shiguemori, Elcio H.",
affiliation = "{Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {Instituto
Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {Instituto de Estudos
Avan{\c{c}}ados (IEAv)}",
title = "An analysis of the influence of the number of observations in a
random forest time series classification to map the forest and
deforestation in the brazilian Amazon",
journal = "International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and
Spatial Information Sciences",
year = "2022",
volume = "43",
number = "B3",
pages = "721--728",
month = "June",
keywords = "Brazilian Amazon, Classification, Land cover, Landsat, Random
Forest, Time series.",
abstract = "Remote sensing has been an essential tool in combating
deforestation. However, the ever-rising deforestation rates
require new remote sensing techniques. This paper presents a study
to determine the effects on the accuracy of the data analysis of
varying the number of satellite observations, using a Random
Forest classification algorithm. We carried out experiments on the
Landsat-8 data cube with 22 images and developed an automatic
sampling system based on PRODES to generate the labeled time
series. We split the time series dataset to build data subsets
with different number of observations. The results showed that a
fewer number of observations negatively effects the accuracy of
the RF algorithm when analyzing deforested areas, but not forest
areas. The RF classifiers were compared using a random test data
set, where all classifiers presented an Overall Accuracy (OA),
Balanced Accuracy (BA), and f1-score (F1) above 97%. In the first
evaluation, the variation in the number of observations appears to
cause little influence on the classification accuracy. The
analysis used the reference map to contrast the RF classifier's
results. The results showed that the best results in OA occurred
with fewer observations. The best performance of 96% happened with
four observations. We evaluated the performance of the classes,
deforestation, and forest individually. The results showed that a
fewer number of observations had negative effects on the accuracy
of the RF algorithm when analyzing deforested areas, but not
forest areas. Finally, we evaluated the visual quality of the land
cover maps produced.",
doi = "10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2022-721-2022",
url = "http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2022-721-2022",
issn = "1682-1750",
language = "en",
targetfile = "isprs-archives-XLIII-B3-2022-721-2022.pdf",
urlaccessdate = "29 jun. 2024"
}