@Article{GanemXRFOCCRDS:2022:MaSoAm,
author = "Ganem, Khalil Ali and Xue, Yongkang and Rodrigues, Ariane de
Almeida and Franca Rocha, Washington and Oliveira, Marceli Terra
de and Carvalho, Nathalia Silva de and Cayo, Efrain Yury Turpo and
Rosa, Marcos Reis and Dutra, Andeise Cerqueira and Shimabukuro,
Yosio Edemir",
affiliation = "{University of California} and {University of California} and
{Universidade de Bras{\'{\i}}lia (UnB)} and {Universidade
Estadual de Feira de Santana (UEFS)} and {Instituto Nacional de
Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas
Espaciais (INPE)} and {Universidad Nacional Agraria La Molina} and
{Universidade Estadual de Feira de Santana (UEFS)} and {Instituto
Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {Instituto Nacional de
Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)}",
title = "Mapping South America's Drylands through Remote Sensing-A Review
of the Methodological Trends and Current Challenges",
journal = "Remote Sensing",
year = "2022",
volume = "14",
number = "3",
pages = "e736",
month = "Feb.",
keywords = "land use and land cover, aridity, drought, Landsat, MODIS,
savannas, shrublands, grasslands, woodlands.",
abstract = "The scientific grasp of the distribution and dynamics of land use
and land cover (LULC) changes in South America is still limited.
This is especially true for the continent's hyperarid, arid,
semiarid, and dry subhumid zones, collectively known as drylands,
which are under-represented ecosystems that are highly threatened
by climate change and human activity. Maps of LULC in drylands
are, thus, essential in order to investigate their vulnerability
to both natural and anthropogenic impacts. This paper
comprehensively reviewed existing mapping initiatives of South
America's drylands to discuss the main knowledge gaps, as well as
central methodological trends and challenges, for advancing our
understanding of LULC dynamics in these fragile ecosystems. Our
review centered on five essential aspects of remote-sensing-based
LULC mapping: scale, datasets, classification techniques, number
of classes (legends), and validation protocols. The results
indicated that the Landsat sensor dataset was the most frequently
used, followed by AVHRR and MODIS, and no studies used recently
available high-resolution satellite sensors. Machine learning
algorithms emerged as a broadly employed methodology for land
cover classification in South America. Still, such advancement in
classification methods did not yet reflect in the upsurge of
detailed mapping of dryland vegetation types and functional
groups. Among the 23 mapping initiatives, the number of LULC
classes in their respective legends varied from 6 to 39, with 1 to
14 classes representing drylands. Validation protocols included
fieldwork and automatic processes with sampling strategies ranging
from solely random to stratified approaches. Finally, we discussed
the opportunities and challenges for advancing research on
desertification, climate change, fire mapping, and the resilience
of dryland populations. By and large, multi-level studies for
dryland vegetation mapping are still lacking.",
doi = "10.3390/rs14030736",
url = "http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs14030736",
issn = "2072-4292",
language = "en",
targetfile = "remotesensing-14-00736-v2.pdf",
urlaccessdate = "06 jun. 2024"
}