@Article{UrbazaevHHSOTDHUAS:2022:AsTeEl,
author = "Urbazaev, Mikhail and Hess, Laura L. and Hancock, Steven and Sato,
Luciane Yumie and Ometto, Jean Pierre Henry Balbaud and Thiel,
Christian and Dubois, Cl{\'e}mence and Heckel, Kai and Urban,
Marcel and Adam, Markus and Schmullius, Christiane",
affiliation = "{Friedrich Schiller University Jena} and {University of
California} and {University of Edinburgh} and {Instituto Nacional
de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {Instituto Nacional de
Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {German Aerospace Center (DLR)}
and {Friedrich Schiller University Jena} and {Friedrich Schiller
University Jena} and {Friedrich Schiller University Jena} and
{Friedrich Schiller University Jena} and {Friedrich Schiller
University Jena}",
title = "Assessment of terrain elevation estimates from ICESat-2 and GEDI
spaceborne LiDAR missions across different land cover and forest
types",
journal = "Science of Remote Sensing",
year = "2022",
volume = "6",
pages = "100067",
keywords = "terrain elevation, accuracy assessment, GEDI, ICESat-2.",
abstract = "Accurate measurements of terrain elevation are crucial for many
ecological applications. In this study, we sought to assess new
global three-dimensional Earth observation data acquired by the
spaceborne Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR) missions Ice,
Cloud, and Land Elevation Satellite-2 (ICESat-2) and Global
Ecosystem Dynamics Investigation (GEDI). For this, we examined the
ATLAS/ICESat-2 L3A Land and Vegetation Height, version 5 (20 × 14
m and 100 × 14 m segments) and the GEDI Level 2A Footprint
Elevation and Height Metrics, version 2 (25 m circle). We
conducted our analysis across four land cover classes (bare soil,
herbaceous, forest, savanna), and six forest types (temperate
broad-leaved, temperate needle-leaved, temperate mixed, tropical
upland, tropical floodplain, and tropical secondary forest). For
assessment of terrain elevation estimates from spaceborne LiDAR
data we used high resolution airborne data. Our results indicate
that both LiDAR missions provide accurate terrain elevation
estimates across different land cover classes and forest types
with mean error less than 1 m, except in tropical forests.
However, using a GEDI algorithm with a lower signal end threshold
(e.g., algorithm 5) can improve the accuracy of terrain elevation
estimates for tropical upland forests. Specific environmental
parameters (terrain slope, canopy height and canopy cover) and
sensor parameters (GEDI degrade flags, terrain estimation
algorithm; ICESat-2 number of terrain photons, terrain
uncertainty) can be applied to improve the accuracy of ICESat-2
and GEDI-based terrain estimates. Although the goodness-of-fit
statistics from the two spaceborne LiDARs are not directly
comparable since they possess different footprint sizes (100 × 14
m segment or 20 × 14 m segment vs. 25 m circle), we observed
similar trends on the impact of terrain slope, canopy cover and
canopy height for both sensors. Terrain slope strongly impacts the
accuracy of both ICESat-2 and GEDI terrain elevation estimates for
both forested and non-forested areas. In the case of GEDI the
impact of slope is, however, partly caused by horizontal
geolocation error. Moreover, dense canopies (i.e., canopy cover
higher than 90%) affect the accuracy of spaceborne LiDAR terrain
estimates, while canopy height does not, when considering samples
over flat terrains. Our analysis of the accuracy and precision of
current versions of spaceborne LiDAR products for different
vegetation types and environmental conditions provides insights on
parameter selection and estimated uncertainty to inform users of
these key global datasets.",
doi = "10.1016/j.srs.2022.100067",
url = "http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.srs.2022.100067",
issn = "2666-0172",
label = "lattes: 1325667605623244 5 UrbazaevHHSOTDHUAS:2022:AsTeEl",
language = "en",
targetfile = "1-s2.0-S2666017222000293-main.pdf",
urlaccessdate = "18 jun. 2024"
}