@Article{TejadaPinelGBCSMMAGMCDSCCNV:2023:ArBoEs,
author = "Tejada Pinel, Graciela and Gatti, Luciana Vanni and Basso, Luana
Santamaria and Cassol, Henrique Lu{\'{\i}}s Godinho and Silva
J{\'u}nior, Celso Henrique Leite and Mataveli, Guilherme Augusto
Verola and Marani, Luciano and Arai, Egidio and Gloor, Manuel and
Miller, John B. and Cunha, Camilla Lima and Domingues, Lucas Gatti
and Sanchez Ipia, Alber Hamersson and Correia, Caio Silvestre de
Carvalho and Crispim, St{\'e}phane Palma and Neves, Raiane
Aparecida Lopes and Von Randow, Celso",
affiliation = "{Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {Instituto
Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {Instituto Nacional de
Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas
Espaciais (INPE)} and {Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da
Amaz{\^o}nia (INPA)} and {Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas
Espaciais (INPE)} and {Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais
(INPE)} and {Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and
{University of Leeds} and {National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration (NOAA)} and {Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas
Espaciais (INPE)} and {Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais
(INPE)} and {Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and
{Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {Instituto
Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {Instituto Nacional de
Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas
Espaciais (INPE)}",
title = "CO2 emissions in the Amazon: are bottom-up estimates from land use
and cover datasets consistent with top-down estimates based on
atmospheric measurements?",
journal = "Frontiers in Forests and Global Change",
year = "2023",
volume = "6",
pages = "e1107580",
keywords = "Amazon, bottom-up top-down approaches, CO2 atmospheric
measurements, CO2 emissions, emission factors, land use and cover
change.",
abstract = "Amazon forests are the largest forests in the tropics and play a
fundamental role for regional and global ecosystem service
provision. However, they are under threat primarily from
deforestation. Amazonia's carbon balance trend reflects the
condition of its forests. There are different approaches to
estimate large-scale carbon balances, including top-down (e.g.,
CO2 atmospheric measurements combined with atmospheric transport
information) and bottom-up (e.g., land use and cover change (LUCC)
data based on remote sensing methods). It is important to
understand their similarities and differences. Here we provide
bottom-up LUCC estimates and determine to what extent they are
consistent with recent top-down flux estimates during 2010 to 2018
for the Brazilian Amazon. We combine LUCC datasets resulting in
annual LUCC maps from 2010 to 2018 with emissions and removals for
each LUCC, and compare the resulting CO2 estimates with top-down
estimates based on atmospheric measurements. We take into account
forest carbon stock maps for estimating loss processes, and carbon
uptake of regenerating and mature forests. In the bottom-up
approach total CO2 emissions (2010 to 2018), deforestation and
degradation are the largest contributing processes accounting for
58% (4.3 PgCO2) and 37% (2.7 PgCO2) respectively. Looking at the
total carbon uptake, primary forests play a dominant role
accounting for 79% (\−5.9 PgCO2) and secondary forest
growth for 17% (\−1.2 PgCO2). Overall, according to our
bottom-up estimates the Brazilian Amazon is a carbon sink until
2014 and a source from 2015 to 2018. In contrast according to the
top-down approach the Brazilian Amazon is a source during the
entire period. Both approaches estimate largest emissions in 2016.
During the period where flux signs are the same (20152018)
top-down estimates are approximately 3 times larger in 20152016
than bottom-up estimates while in 20172018 there is closer
agreement. There is some agreement between the approachesnotably
that the Brazilian Amazon has been a source during 20152018
however there are also disagreements. Generally, emissions
estimated by the bottom-up approach tend to be lower.
Understanding the differences will help improve both approaches
and our understanding of the Amazon carbon cycle under human
pressure and climate change.",
doi = "10.3389/ffgc.2023.1107580",
url = "http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/ffgc.2023.1107580",
issn = "2624-893X",
label = "self-archiving-INPE-MCTIC-GOV-BR",
language = "en",
targetfile = "ffgc-06-1107580.pdf",
urlaccessdate = "15 jun. 2024"
}