@Article{LoeschOphAlvEvaMan:2011:SiTwDi,
author = "Loesch, C. and Opher, Merav and Alves, Maria Virginia and Evans,
R. M. and Manchester, W. B.",
affiliation = "{Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and George
Mason Univ, Dept Phys \& Astron, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA and
{Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and George
Mason Univ, Dept Phys \& Astron, Fairfax, VA 22030 USA and Univ
Michigan, Ctr Space Environm Modeling, Ann Arbor, MI 48108 USA",
title = "Signatures of two distinct driving mechanisms in the evolution of
coronal mass ejections in the lower corona",
journal = "Journal of Geophysical Research",
year = "2011",
volume = "116",
pages = "A04106",
month = "Apr.",
keywords = "MAGNETIC-FLUX TUBES, SOLAR-WIND, MAGNETOHYDRODYNAMIC MODEL,
INTERPLANETARY SHOCKS, SHEATH STRUCTURES, ROPE, ACCELERATION,
SIMULATION, CME, PROPAGATION.",
abstract = "We present a comparison between two simulations of coronal mass
ejections (CMEs), in the lower corona, driven by different flux
rope mechanisms presented in the literature. Both mechanisms
represent different magnetic field configurations regarding the
amount of twist of the magnetic field lines and different initial
energies. They are used as a {"}proof of concept{"} to explore how
different initialization mechanisms can be distinguished from each
other in the lower corona. The simulations are performed using the
Space Weather Modeling Framework (SWMF) during solar minimum
conditions with a steady state solar wind obtained through an
empirical approach to mimic the physical processes driving the
solar wind. Although the two CMEs possess different initial
energies (differing by an order of magnitude) and magnetic
configurations, the main observables such as acceleration, shock
speed, Mach number, and theta(Bn) (the angle between the shock
normal and the upstream magnetic field) present very similar
behavior between 2 and 6 R(circle dot). We believe that through
the analysis of other quantities, such as sheath width and
postshock compression (pileup and shock indentation compressions),
the effect of different magnetic configurations and
initializations can be distinguished. We discuss that coronal
models that employ a reduced value of polytropic index (gamma) may
significantly change the energetics of the CME and that the
background solar wind plays an important role in the CMEs' shock
and sheath evolution.",
doi = "10.1029/2010JA015582",
url = "http://dx.doi.org/10.1029/2010JA015582",
issn = "0148-0227 and 2156-2202",
label = "lattes: 6460301165792800 3 LoeschOphAlvEvaMan:2011:SiTwDi",
language = "en",
targetfile = "2010JA015582.pdf",
urlaccessdate = "20 abr. 2024"
}