@Article{TarasovaCalv:2002:GCReSa,
author = "Tarasova, Tatiana Alekandrovna and Calvalcanti, Iracema Fonseca de
Albuquerque",
affiliation = "{Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {Instituto
Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)}",
title = "Monthly mean solar radiative fluxes and cloud forcing over South
America in the period of 1986-88: GCM results and
satellite-derived data",
journal = "Journal of Applied Meteorology",
year = "2002",
volume = "41",
number = "8",
pages = "863--871",
month = "Aug.",
keywords = "estudo do clima e do tempo, biosphere model, surface, absorption,
irradiance, climate, aerosol, atmosphere, parameterization,
scale.",
abstract = "The incident solar radiative fluxes, simulated by an atmospheric
general circulation model over South America for the period
1986-88, are compared with the satellite-derived surface fluxes
provided by the Surface Radiation Budget (SRB)datasets. The
comparison shows that the model systematically overestimates both
all-sky and clear-sky SRB fluxes while representing well their
latitudinal variations. In order to analyze the reasons for the
bias, the shortwave radiation code employed in the model is tested
with more comprehensive techniques in a stand-alone mode. The
results of testing demonstrate that the code underestimates solar
radiation due to trace gases and aerosols. The underestimation of
the absorption due to aerosols contributes noticeably to the
surface flux bias. The impact of clouds on the surface fluxes is
estimated by calculating cloud radiative forcing, defined as the
difference between the net surface fluxes in all-sky and clear-sky
conditions. The comparison of model-simulated and
satellite-derived values of cloud radiative forcing over South
America demonstrates that the model simulates fairly well its
latitudinal variations and annual cycles as compared with SRB
data. However, the model overestimates the SRB surface cloud
radiative forcing over the tropical region of South America and
underestimates it over the extratropical region in both January
and July. The comparisons of the incident surface fluxes simulated
by the model at the grid points with those measured at three
Amazonian observational sites show good agreement at one site and
large discrepancies at the other two sites.",
copyholder = "SID/SCD",
issn = "0894-8763",
language = "en",
targetfile = "Tarasova_Monthy mean solar.pdf",
urlaccessdate = "03 maio 2024"
}