@Article{SeluchiChan:2003:EvTwEt,
author = "Seluchi, Marcelo E. and Chan, Chou Sin",
affiliation = "{Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)/CPTEC} and {}",
title = "Evaluation of two Eta Model versions for weather forecast over
South America",
journal = "Geof{\'{\i}}sica Internacional",
year = "2003",
volume = "40",
number = "3",
pages = "219--237",
month = "May",
keywords = "Meteorologia, modelado regional, desempenho, processos
superficiais, Sudamerica.",
abstract = "A comparison of performance of two versions of the Eta/CPTEC model
is presented. The new version is an update of an carlier
operational one and includes representation, of soil and
vegetation types. The sofilvegetation model contains two under-
ground layers and a canopy layer. Evaluation was carried out by
comparing the mean and root mean square errors of several
variables for an ensemble of 15 meteorological situations, using
the NCEP analyses, upper air soundings and precipitation data over
South America. Precipitation forecasts were evaluated by the
equitable threat score (ETS) and the b{\'{\i}}as score
(BIAS).The mean errors frorn both versions show similarities
during the first 24 hours of forecast, but surface temperature is
more accurately predicted by the updated model. After 48 hours,
temperature and humidity forecasts show better skill in the new
version too. Over subtropical South America differences are more
evident in temperature and humidity, less so for geopotential
heights and practically nonexistent for horizontal winds. The
precipitation forecasts for the updated version have equitable
threat scores slightly higher and similar bias scores during the
first 24 hours. After 48 hours; this version tends to overestimate
the rainfall, while its spatial distribution remains unaffected.",
copyholder = "SID/SCD",
issn = "0016-7169",
language = "en",
targetfile = "Evalution Eta.Seluchi.pdf",
urlaccessdate = "03 maio 2024"
}