@Article{CorreiaAlvaManz:2007:ReClMo,
author = "Correia, F. W. and Alval{\'a}, R. C. and Manzi, Antonio Ocimar",
affiliation = "State University of Amazonas (UEA), Manaus, AM, Brazil and
{Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE/CPTEC)} and
National Institute for Amazonia Research (INPA), Manaus, AM,
Brazil",
title = "Modeling the impacts of land cover change in Amazonia: a regional
climate model (RCM) simulation study",
journal = "Theoretical and Applied Climatology",
year = "2007",
volume = "93",
number = "3-4",
pages = "225--244",
month = "Jan.",
keywords = "Amazonia, deforestation, GCM, eta, SSiB.",
abstract = "The numerical regional model (Eta) coupled with the Simplified
Simple Biosphere Model (SSiB) was used to investigate the impact
of land cover changes on the regional climate in Amazonia. Four
13-month integrations were performed for the following scenarios:
(a) no deforestation, (b) current conditions, (c) deforestation
predicted for 2033, and (d) large scale deforestation. Ali initial
and prescribed boundary conditions were kept identical for ali
integrations, except the )and cover changes. The results show that
during the dry season the post-deforestation decrease in root
depth plays an important role in the energy budget, since lo there
is less soil moisture available for evapotranspiration. In ali
scenarios there was a significant increase in the surface
temperature, from 2.0°C in the first scenario, up to 2.8°C in the
last one. In both the scenarios (b) and (c), the downward
component of the surface solar radiation decreased due to an
increase in the cloud cover over deforested areas, which
contributed to even further reduction of the net radiation
absorbed at the surface. The cloud mechanism, where an increase in
albedo is balanced by an increase in downward solar radiation, was
not detected in any of these scenarios. In scenarios (a), (b) and
(c), a negative feedback mechanism was observed in the
hydrological cycle, with greater amounts of moisture being carried
to the deforested areas. The increase in moisture convergente was
greater than the reduction in evapotranspiration for both
scenarios (b) and (c). This result and the meso-scale
thermodynamic processes caused an increase in precipitation. A
different situation was observed in the large-scale deforestation
scenario (d): a local increase of moisture convergente was
observed, but not sufficiently intense to generate an increase in
precipitation; so, the local evapotranspiration decrease was
dominant in this scenario. Therefore, partia) deforestation in
Amazonia can actually lead to an increase in precipitation
locally. However, if the deforestation increases, this condition
becomes unsustainable,leading to drier conditions and,
consequently, to reduced precipitation in the region.",
copyholder = "SID/SCD",
doi = "10.1007/s00704-007-0335-z",
url = "http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00704-007-0335-z",
issn = "0177-798X",
language = "en",
targetfile = "Correia et al - 0-335-1.pdf",
urlaccessdate = "03 maio 2024"
}