@Article{MendonçaMaRoBoOmOt:2018:BiReUr,
               author = "Mendon{\c{c}}a, Henrique Vieira de and Martins, Carlos 
                         Eug{\^e}nio and Rocha, Wadson Sebasti{\~a}o Duarte da and 
                         Borges, Cristiano Amancio Vieira and Ometto, Jean Pierre Henry 
                         Balbaud and Otenio, Marcelo Henrique",
          affiliation = "{Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora (UFJF)} and {Empresa 
                         Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecu{\'a}ria (EMBRAPA)} and {Empresa 
                         Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecu{\'a}ria (EMBRAPA)} and {Empresa 
                         Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecu{\'a}ria (EMBRAPA)} and {Instituto 
                         Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)}",
                title = "Biofertilizer replace urea as a source of nitrogen for sugarcane 
                         production",
              journal = "Water, Air, and Soil Pollution",
                 year = "2018",
               volume = "229",
               number = "7",
                pages = "e216",
                month = "July",
             keywords = "Wastewater reuse . Application rate . Nitrogen . Growth . Biomass 
                         production.",
             abstract = "In this study, different nitrogen doses (0, 16, 48, 64, 80, and 96 
                         kg ha\−1 ) from two sources, biofertilizer (from anaerobic 
                         digestion of cattle wastewater) and urea, were applied to 
                         cultivate two sugarcane varieties (RB 867515 and SP 803280). °Brix 
                         values higher than 21% were obtained with application of 80 kg 
                         ha\−1 from biofertilizer. The mean productivity of the 
                         cultivar RB 867515 using biofertilizer was 147.5 ton ha\−1 
                         , while from urea it was 136.87 ton ha\−1 . The cultivar SP 
                         803280 produced an average yield of 152.25 ton ha\−1 when 
                         applying biofertilizer and 154.37 ton ha\−1 with use of 
                         urea. Significant differences (P \≤ 0.05) between the use 
                         of biofertilizer and urea were detected for cultivar RB 867515 in 
                         terms of crude protein concentration. The application of 80 kg of 
                         N ha\−1 was considered the ideal dose, corresponding to 
                         fertirrigation blades of 54 mm of biofertilizer. The experiment 
                         showed that the biofertilizer formulation analyzed can replace 
                         urea as a nitrogen source for growing sugarcane.",
                  doi = "10.1007/s11270-018-3874-2",
                  url = "http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11270-018-3874-2",
                 issn = "0049-6979",
             language = "en",
           targetfile = "mendonca_biofertilizer.pdf",
        urlaccessdate = "25 abr. 2024"
}