@Article{CarvalhoMora:2020:SeApUs,
author = "Carvalho, Jean P. S. and Moraes, Rodolpho Vilhena de",
affiliation = "{Universidade Federal do Rec{\^o}ncavo da Bahia (UFRBA)} and
{Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)}",
title = "A semi-analytical approach using the single and double averaged
methods and the Lidov–Kozai mechanism",
journal = "European Physical Journal Special Topics",
year = "2020",
volume = "229",
number = "8",
pages = "1491--1500",
month = "May",
abstract = "An analysis of the orbital motion of artificial satellites around
Mercury is presented taking into account its non-sphericity (J(2),
J(3), C-22) and the perturbation of the third body. The disturbing
potential due to the third body is developed in circular and
inclined orbit. The double-averaged method should be used with
caution in some situations where the averaging is applied at
different timescales. In this work, a study is presented
considering this observation for orbits around Mercury. When the
mean anomaly of the Sun is eliminated, the idea is that all
effects whose periods below 88 days are neglected. As the rotation
of Mercury is about 58.6 days, this means that the perturbation
due to the C-22 term must also be neglected. However, since the
C-22 term is important and should be taken into account, then
terms longer than 58.6 days should also be preserved. In other
words, keeping the C-22 term with a period of 58.6 days means that
the solar terms with the longest period (88 days) will be
maintained here. The single-averaged method is applied to
eliminate only the mean anomaly of the spacecraft. A comparison
between the single and double averaged models is presented. We
found that for the case of Mercury the two models are in
agreement, but the single-averaged model is more realistic because
it keeps more terms in the disturbing potential. Several types of
resonances can be analyzed starting of the single-averaged
potential. Considering our single-averaged disturbing potential,
the terms due to Lidov-Kozai resonance were isolated to make a
qualitative analysis considering the libration and circulation
regions in the diagram, eccentricity versus argument of the
pericenter.",
doi = "10.1140/epjst/e2020-900161-1",
url = "http://dx.doi.org/10.1140/epjst/e2020-900161-1",
issn = "1951-6355",
language = "en",
targetfile = "carvalho_semi.pdf",
urlaccessdate = "25 abr. 2024"
}