@Article{BarretoMendLuci:2021:SeCMMo,
author = "Barreto, Naurinete de Jesus da Costa and Mendes, David and Lucio,
Paulo S.",
affiliation = "{Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and
{Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)} and
{Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte (UFRN)}",
title = "Sensitivity of the CMIP5 models to precipitation in Tropical
Brazil",
journal = "Revista Ibero-Americana de Ci{\^e}ncias Ambientais",
year = "2021",
volume = "12",
number = "1",
month = "jan.",
keywords = "Climatic Change, Historical Period, Rainfall, Mudan{\c{c}}a
clim{\'a}tica, Per{\'{\i}}odo hist{\'o}rico,
Precipita{\c{c}}{\~a}o.",
abstract = "The main objective of this study is to evaluate the ability of the
fifth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5)
models to simulate weekly rainfall over Tropical Brazil.
Twenty-four years of the historical experiment of sixteen models
for the austral summer and fall seasons were evaluated. In the
analyzes performed in this study, frequency distribution and
correlation were used to evaluate temporal variability. Principal
Component Analysis to ascertain the characteristics of the
dominant pattern of each model. The results suggest that some
models have difficulty in simulating the spatial pattern of
regional precipitation, especially related to the frequency of
events and temporal variation, however, the dominant pattern found
by the Principal Component Analysis showed that at least six
models (ACCESS1-0, CanESM2, EC-EARTH, GFDL-CM3, MIROC5 and
MRI-CGCM3) reasonably represented the temporal-space precipitation
regime over Tropical Brazil. RESUMO: O objetivo principal deste
estudo {\'e} avaliar a capacidade da quinta fase dos modelos do
Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) em simular chuvas
semanais sobre o Brasil Tropical. Vinte e quatro anos do
experimento hist{\'o}rico de dezesseis modelos para as
esta{\c{c}}{\~o}es do ver{\~a}o e outono austral foram
avaliados. Nas an{\'a}lises realizadas neste estudo, a
distribui{\c{c}}{\~a}o de frequ{\^e}ncia e a
correla{\c{c}}{\~a}o foram utilizadas para avaliar a
variabilidade temporal. An{\'a}lise de componentes principais
para verificar as caracter{\'{\i}}sticas do padr{\~a}o
dominante de cada modelo. Os resultados sugerem que alguns modelos
apresentam dificuldade em simular o padr{\~a}o espacial de
precipita{\c{c}}{\~a}o regional, principalmente em
rela{\c{c}}{\~a}o {\`a} frequ{\^e}ncia de eventos e
varia{\c{c}}{\~a}o temporal, por{\'e}m, o padr{\~a}o dominante
encontrado pela An{\'a}lise de Componentes Principais mostrou que
pelo menos seis modelos (ACCESS1-0, CanESM2, EC-EARTH, GFDL-CM3,
MIROC5 e MRI-CGCM3) representaram razoavelmente o regime de
precipita{\c{c}}{\~a}o no espa{\c{c}}o temporal sobre o Brasil
Tropical.",
issn = "2179-6858",
language = "pt",
targetfile = "barreto_2021.pdf",
urlaccessdate = "16 maio 2024"
}