@Article{SouzaFoLCMNSNBS:2021:LiEcSp,
author = "Souza Filho, Pedro Walfir and Lobo, Felipe de Lucia and
Cavalcante, Rosane Barbosa Lopes and Mota, Jos{\'e} Aroudo and
Nascimento Junior, Wilson da Rocha and Santos, Diogo C. and Novo,
Evlyn M{\'a}rcia Le{\~a}o de Moraes and Barbosa, Cl{\'a}udio
Clemente Faria and Siqueira, Jos{\'e} O.",
affiliation = "{Universidade Federal do Par{\'a} (UFPA)} and {Universidade
Federal de Pelotas (UFPel)} and {Universidade Federal do Par{\'a}
(UFPA)} and {Instituto de Pesquisa Econ{\^o}mica Aplicada (IPEA)}
and {Universidade Federal do Par{\'a} (UFPA)} and {Universidade
Federal do Par{\'a} (UFPA)} and {Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas
Espaciais (INPE)} and {Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais
(INPE)} and {Universidade Federal de Lavras (UFLA)}",
title = "Land-use intensity of official mineral extraction in the Amazon
region: Linking economic and spatial data",
journal = "Land Degradation and Development",
year = "2021",
volume = "32",
number = "4",
pages = "1706--1717",
month = "Feb.",
keywords = "Amazon, deforestation, mining activities, protected area, remote
sensing.",
abstract = "The Amazon region has suffered considerable deforestation rates
related to logging, cattle ranching, and agriculture. Recently,
attention has been given to deforestation due to mining
activities. This paper aims to estimate the land area affected by
mining activities in protected and nonprotected areas, the value
of the traded mineral extraction per commodity, and the mineral
commodity with the highest trade (mineral extraction per mining
area). Our results show that mining activities occupied 1,110
km(2) of the Amazon, where 65% and 35% of this was due to
artisanal and industrial-scale mining, respectively. Gold
exploitation was responsible for 58% of the total, followed by
aluminum (15%), tin (13%), and iron (8%). In the region, 47% of
the total mining area was located inside protected areas, where
extraction was dominated by artisanal gold mining. The Amazonian
states generated US\$ 12.6 billion in 2017. Analysis of the
values of the traded production showed that iron was responsible
for 63.6%, followed by copper (16.2%), aluminum (7.6%), and gold
(6.5%). The value of the traded production of gold was relatively
low (US\$ 810 million) in comparison to iron (US\$ 8.01 billion)
and copper (US\$ 2.04 billion), which occupied the smallest
areas. The value of the traded production per area showed that
iron ore exploitation generated US\$ 91.8 million/km(2), while
gold generated only 1.3 million/km(2). We conclude that the
industrial mining of iron ore presented the lowest impacts in
mining areas with higher traded mineral extraction, while
artisanal gold production ran contrary to environmental
conservation goals.",
doi = "10.1002/ldr.3810",
url = "http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3810",
issn = "1085-3278",
language = "en",
targetfile = "souza filho_land.pdf",
urlaccessdate = "20 maio 2024"
}