@InProceedings{LapolaSSGACDRVR:2021:BeEfEC,
author = "Lapola, David and Sampaio, Gilvan and Shimizu, Mar{\'{\i}}lia
Harumi and Guimar{\~a}es J{\'u}nior, Carlos Augusto and
Alexandre, Felipe and Cardoso, Manoel Ferreira and Domingues,
Tomas and Rammig, Anja and Von Randow, Celso and Rezende, Luiz
Felipe Campos de",
affiliation = "{Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP)} and {Instituto
Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {Instituto Nacional de
Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas
Espaciais (INPE)} and {} and {Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas
Espaciais (INPE)} and {} and {} and {Instituto Nacional de
Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas
Espaciais (INPE)}",
title = "Beta effect of eCO2 can cause as much rainfall decrease as
large-scale deforestation in the Amazon",
year = "2021",
organization = "EGU General Assembly",
publisher = "EGU",
abstract = "Amazon regions climate is particularly sensitive to surface
processes and properties such as heat fluxes and vegetation
coverage. Rainfall is a key expression of such land
surface-atmosphere interactions in the region due to its strong
dependence on forest transpiration. While a large number of past
studies have shown the impacts of large-scale deforestation on
annual rainfall, studies on the isolated effects of elevated
atmospheric CO2 concentration (eCO2) on plant physiology (i.e. the
\β effect), for example on canopy transpiration and
rainfall, are scarcer. Here we make a systematic comparison of the
plant physiological effects of eCO2 and deforestation on Amazon
rainfall. We use the CPTEC-Brazilian Atmospheric Model (BAM) with
dynamic vegetation under a 1.5xCO2 and a 100% substitution of the
forest by pasture grassland, with all other conditions held
similar between the two scenarios. We find that both scenarios
result in equivalent average annual rainfall reductions
(Physiology: -252 mm,-12%; Deforestation: -292 mm, -13%) that are
well above observed Amazon rainfall interannual variability of
5.1%. Rainfall decrease in the two scenarios are caused by a
reduction of approximately 20% of canopy transpiration, but for
different reasons: eCO2-driven reduction of stomatal conductance
in the Physiology run; decreased leaf area index of pasture (-66%)
and its dry-season lower surface vegetation coverage in the
Deforestation run. Walker circulation is strengthened in the two
scenarios (with enhanced convection over the Andes and a weak
subsidence branch over east Amazon) but, again, through different
mechanisms: enhanced west winds from the Pacific and reduced
easterlies entering the basin in Physiology, and strongly
increased easterlies in Deforestation. Although our results for
the Deforestation scenario are in agreement with previous
observational and modelling studies, the lack of direct
field-based ecosystem-level experimental evidence on the effect of
eCO2 in moisture fluxes of tropical forests confers a substantial
level of uncertainty to this and any other projections on the
physiological effect of eCO2 on Amazon rainfall. Furthermore, our
results denote the incurred responsibilities of both Amazonian and
non- Amazonian countries to mitigate potential future climatic
change and its impacts in the region driven either by local
deforestation (to be tackled by Amazonian countries) or global CO2
emissions (to be handled by all countries).",
conference-location = "Online",
conference-year = "19-30 apr.",
doi = "10.5194/egusphere-egu21-8739",
url = "http://dx.doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu21-8739",
language = "en",
targetfile = "EGU21-8739-print.pdf",
urlaccessdate = "20 maio 2024"
}