@Article{SotheAlmSchLieDia:2021:AuTuSe,
author = "Sothe, Camile and Almeida, Cl{\'a}udia Maria de and Schimalski,
Marcos Benedito and Liesenberg, Veraldo and Diaz, Pedro
Achanccaray",
affiliation = "{Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {Instituto
Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {Universidade do
Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)} and {Universidade do Estado de
Santa Catarina (UDESC)} and {Pontif{\'{\i}}cia Universidade
Cat{\'o}lica do Rio de Janeiro (PUC-Rio)}",
title = "Automatic tuning of segmentation parameters for tree crown
delineation with VHR imagery",
journal = "Geocarto International",
year = "2021",
volume = "36",
number = "19",
pages = "2241--2259",
keywords = "image segmentation, Individual tree crown, metaheuristic methods,
object-based image analysis, optimization function.",
abstract = "In the case of tree species delineation with very high spatial
resolution (VHR) images, is desirable that each segment
corresponds to one individual tree crown (ITC). However, in order
to have a segmentation algorithm that generates segments matching
to ITCs, its parameters ought to be properly tuned. Aiming to
avoid time-consuming trial-and-error procedures associated with
this task, some initiatives for the automatic search of
segmentation parameters have been developed, such as metaheuristic
methods. The objective of this work was to test the automatic
tuning of segmentation parameters of three segmentation algorithms
for the delineation of ITCs belonging to a native endangered
species in a subtropical forest area, comparing this method with
the traditional trial-and-error approach. Two datasets
(WorldView-2 and an orthoimage) and three segmentation algorithms
(multiresolution, mean-shift and graph-based) were tested. For the
automatic approach, a hybrid metaheuristic method was applied to
accomplish the automatic search of parameters for the segmentation
algorithms, while for the trial-and-error, a visual assessment was
conducted for each set of parameters tested. Four supervised
metrics were used to assess the quality of the segmentation
results for the optimization approach and for the final set of
parameters chosen in the trial-and-error approach. Results showed
that none of the algorithms, datasets or approaches differ too
much. The evaluation metrics values were lower, indicating that
the reference ITCs polygons matched with the segmentation results.
Despite the similar results, the automatic tuning of segmentation
parameters proved to be a feasible alternative to reduce the
subjectivity and the human effort in the choice of segmentation
parameters as compared to the trial-and error approach.",
doi = "10.1080/10106049.2019.1690056",
url = "http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2019.1690056",
issn = "1010-6049",
language = "en",
targetfile = "sothe_automatic.pdf",
urlaccessdate = "09 maio 2024"
}