@Article{GanFPRGFNS:2021:PaII,
author = "Gan, Manoel Alonso and Ferreira, S{\'e}rgio Henrique Soares and
Piva, Everson D. and Rozante, Jos{\'e} Roberto and Garcia,
Jos{\'e} Roberto Motta and Fernandes, Alex de Almeida and Neves,
Andr{\'e} Lucio de Oliveira and Silva, Vinicios Matoso",
affiliation = "{Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {Instituto
Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {Universidade Federal
de Santa Maria (UFSM)} and {Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas
Espaciais (INPE)} and {Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais
(INPE)} and {Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and
{Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {Instituto
Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)}",
title = "Avalia{\c{c}}{\~a}o da Energ{\'e}tica Prevista nos Modelos
Regionais BRAMS, ETA e WRF: Parte I-Inverno",
journal = "Revista Brasileira de Meteorologia",
year = "2021",
volume = "36",
number = "4",
pages = "775--803",
keywords = "Evaluation, Kinetic energy, Regional models, energia
cin{\'e}tica, avalia{\c{c}}{\~a}o, modelos regionais.",
abstract = "The aim of this study is to evaluate the terms of the eddy kinetic
energy (K) equation in the 24 h and 48 h forecasts of the regional
models BRAMS, WRF and ETA. These models were operationally
integrated at the Weather Forecast and Climate Studies Center
(CPTEC). The evaluation period was from June 1 to August 31, 2016
and the domain was the region of South America. The horizontal
resolution of the three models is 5 km and the temporal is 6 h.
The initial and boundary conditions were obtained from the Global
Forecast System (GFS) of the National Centers for Environmental
Prediction (NCEP), with a horizontal resolution of 0.25°. The
models were initialized only with the analysis of 1200 UTC. The
non-hydrostatic version of the three models was run, with WRF
using Kain-Frisch cumulus parameterization, ETA Betts-Miller
culumus parameterization and BRAMS Grell and Freitas. In general,
the three models underestimate K in mid-latitudes, mainly over the
oceans, however, ETA is the one that underestimates the least and
WRF the most. Regarding the terms of baroclinic and barotropic
conversion, in addition to the term of ageostrophic flow
convergence, the three models have a similar pattern of these
three terms with that of GFS numerical analysis. RESUMO: O
objetivo deste estudo {\'e} avaliar os termos da
equa{\c{c}}{\~a}o da tend{\^e}ncia da energia cin{\'e}tica do
dist{\'u}rbio (K) nas previs{\~o}es de 24 h e 48 h dos modelos
regionais BRAMS, WRF e ETA. Estes modelos foram integrados
operacionalmente no Centro de Previs{\~a}o de Tempo e Estudos
Clim{\'a}ticos (CPTEC). O per{\'{\i}}odo de
avalia{\c{c}}{\~a}o foi de 1 de junho a 31 de agosto de 2016,
sendo que o dom{\'{\i}}nio utilizado foi a regi{\~a}o da
Am{\'e}rica do Sul. A resolu{\c{c}}{\~a}o horizontal dos
modelos {\'e} de 5 km e a temporal {\'e} de 6 horas. As
condi{\c{c}}{\~o}es iniciais e de contorno foram obtidas do
Global Forecast System (GFS) do National Centers for Environmental
Prediction (NCEP), com resolu{\c{c}}{\~a}o horizontal de 0,25°.
Os modelos foram inicializados apenas com a an{\'a}lise das 1200
UTC. Os modelos foram integrados com a vers{\~a}o
n{\~a}o-hidrost{\'a}tica, sendo que o WRF utilizou a
parametriza{\c{c}}{\~a}o cumulus de Kain-Frisch, o ETA a
parametriza{\c{c}}{\~a}o culumus de Betts-Miller e o BRAMS Grell
e Freitas. Em geral, os tr{\^e}s modelos subestimam K nas
latitudes m{\'e}dias, principalmente sobre os oceanos, por{\'e}m
o ETA {\'e} o que menos subestima e o WRF o que tem o maior
vi{\'e}s negativo. Com rela{\c{c}}{\~a}o aos termos de
convers{\~a}o barocl{\'{\i}}nica e barotr{\'o}pica, al{\'e}m
do termo de converg{\^e}ncia do fluxo ageostr{\'o}fico, os
tr{\^e}s modelos apresentam um padr{\~a}o semelhante aos das
an{\'a}lises num{\'e}ricas do GFS.",
doi = "10.1590/0102-77863640042",
url = "http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0102-77863640042",
issn = "0102-7786",
language = "pt",
targetfile = "Gan_2021.pdf",
urlaccessdate = "02 maio 2024"
}