@InProceedings{CsillikKLFPGOSS:2023:HiAbCa,
author = "Csillik, Ovidiu and Keller, Michael and Longo, Marcos and Ferraz,
Antonio and Pinag{\'e}, Ekena Rangel and G{\"o}rgens, Eric
Bastos and Ometto, Jean Pierre Henry Balbaud and Silgueiro,
Vinicius and Sattchi, Sassan S.",
affiliation = "{California Institute of Technology} and {California Institute of
Technology} and {Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory} and
{California Institute of Technology} and {Oregon State University}
and {Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri} and
{Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {Instituto
Centro de Vida (ICV)} and {California Institute of Technology}",
title = "High-resolution aboveground carbon changes in the Brazilian Amazon
using repeated airborne lidar",
booktitle = "Proceedings...",
year = "2023",
organization = "AGU FAll Meeting",
publisher = "AGU",
abstract = "The Brazilian Amazon is a hotspot of deforestation and forest
degradation caused by logging, fire, and deforestation-associated
fragmentation and edge effects. While the extent of deforestation
and associated carbon losses are relatively well known, the
quantification of the carbon losses caused by degradation and the
carbon gained by recovery of degraded forest ranges widely and is
difficult to quantify accurately regionally. We analyzed forest
changes and associated carbon gains and losses by using repeated
randomized airborne lidar surveys for 2016 and 2017-2018 over 99
different transects, totaling 48,279 ha of forest throughout the
Brazilian Arc of Deforestation. We directly measured changes in
canopy height between the two airborne lidar campaigns, and
gridded the surveyed area into 50 x 50 m cells to estimate
aboveground carbon using a previously calibrated model based on
the top of canopy height. We classified every 0.25 ha cell into
one of the seven forest transition classes: deforestation, forest
fires, logging, windthrows, other disturbances, forest growth, and
no change. We found that disturbances directly attributed to human
activity impacted 4.2% of the survey area while windthrows and
other disturbances affected 2.7% and 14.7% respectively. By
extrapolating the lidar-based statistics to the study area
(544,300 km2), we found that 24.1, 24.2, and 14.5 Tg C y-1 were
lost through deforestation, fires, and logging, respectively. The
losses due to large windthrows (21.5 Tg C y-1) and other
disturbances (50.3 Tg C y-1) were partially counterbalanced by
forest growth (44.1 Tg C y-1). Our high-resolution estimates
demonstrated a greater loss of carbon through forest degradation
than through deforestation and a net loss of carbon of 90.5 ± 20.8
Tg C y-1 for the study region attributable to both anthropogenic
and natural processes. Our regional detailed quantification of
carbon changes highlights that degradation is a major driver of
the carbon budget of the Amazon tropical forest.",
conference-location = "San Francisco, CA",
conference-year = "11-15 Dec. 2023",
language = "en",
urlaccessdate = "21 maio 2024"
}