@Article{PinheiroHodgGan:2019:ImNuSe,
author = "Pinheiro, Henri Rossi and Hodges, Kevin Ivan and Gan, Manoel
Alonso",
affiliation = "{Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {The
University of Reading} and {Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas
Espaciais (INPE)}",
title = "Sensitivity of identifying cut-off lows in the Southern Hemisphere
using multiple criteria: implications for numbers, seasonality and
intensity",
journal = "Climate Dynamics",
year = "2019",
volume = "53",
number = "11",
pages = "6699--6713",
note = "{Setores de Atividade: Pesquisa e desenvolvimento
cient{\'{\i}}fico.}",
keywords = "V{\'o}rtice Cicl{\^o}nico de Altos N{\'{\i}}veis, m{\'e}todo
objetivo, crit{\'e}rio.",
abstract = "Cut-of Low (COLs) are often associated with heavy precipitation
and strong wind events, but there are still uncertainties on how
their identifcation afect the numbers and seasonality. This paper
aims to determine the sensitivity of identifying Southern
Hemisphere COLs in the ERA-Interim reanalysis to diferent types of
identifcation criteria. Upper-level cyclones are initially tracked
on the 300 hPa level using relative vorticity and geopotential in
order to present diferent perspectives. This reveals signifcant
diferences between the numbers and length of the identifed tracks
for the two felds. To identify the COLs diferent post-tracking
flters are applied which are divided into two steps. Firstly,
three flters are considered to separate cut-of lows from open
troughs by sampling winds at diferent ofset radial distances from
the upper-level cyclonic centres. Secondly, potential vorticity
and temperature criteria are imposed to determine how these
conditions afect the identifed COLs in terms of numbers,
seasonality and intensity. It was found that methods based on
multiple criteria restrict the COL identifcation by imposing
specifc characteristics, while methods based on simpler schemes
(e.g. using only winds) can detect larger samples of COLs observed
visually in the geopotential maps. Although it is difcult to say
which method is more accurate in identifying COLs, because of the
subjective aspect of observers assessment, a scheme using only
winds should be more representative of reality as this simply
imposes on the detection system a cyclonic circulation appearance
regardless of the physical and dynamical characteristics.
Therefore, this type of method could be considered as a standard
method for identifying COLs that can be used for either
operational or research purposes.",
doi = "10.1007/s00382-019-04984-x",
url = "http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00382-019-04984-x",
issn = "0930-7575",
label = "lattes: 3214369697732376 3 PinheiroHodgGan:2019:ImNuSe",
language = "en",
targetfile = "pinheiro_sensitivity.pdf",
url = "https://link.springer.com/epdf/10.1007/s00382-019-04984-x?author_access_token=U990UBhl9woY9XVTPTIMHPe4RwlQNchNByi7wbcMAY5wuZFyUpDDVb2CTa-ejbflQaufe4sdTwsAMB7LoCAy0tc8qFbHJbDNqiYPyQJZ6z_ugZIpDmfZcJFp7sOVGjyer8Y3Y8WTdTdHjwjditPfrg%3D%3D",
urlaccessdate = "11 maio 2024"
}