@InCollection{SatterfieldWKHHEMMFISMHJLMELBYLBRSMMTM:2021:ApMeRa,
author = "Satterfield, Elizabeth A. and Waller, Joanne A. and Kuhl, David D.
and Hodyss, Dan and Hoppel, Karl W. and Eckermann, Stephen D. and
McCormack, John P. and Ma, Jun and Fritts, David C and Iimura,
Hiroiyuki and Stober, Gunter and Meek, Chris E. and Hall, Chris
and Jacobi, Christoph and Latteck, Ralph and Mitchell, Nicholas J.
and Espy, Patrick J. and Li, Guozhu and Brown, Peter and Yi, Wen
and Li, Na and Batista, Paulo Prado and Reid, Ian and Sunkara,
Eswaraiah and Moffat-Griffin, Tracy and Murphy, Damian and
Tsutsumi, Masaki and Marino, John",
title = "Statistical Parameter Estimation for Observation Error Modelling:
Application to Meteor Radars",
booktitle = "Data Assimilation for Atmospheric, Oceanic and Hydrologic
Applications (Vol. IV)",
publisher = "Springer",
year = "2021",
editor = "Park, S. K. and Xu, L.",
pages = "185--213",
keywords = "meteor radar, data assimilation.",
abstract = "Data assimilation schemes blend observational data, with limited
coverage, with a short term forecast to produce an analysis, which
is meant to be the best estimate of the current state of the
atmosphere. Appropriately specifying observation error statistics
is necessary to obtain an optimal analysis. Observation error can
originate from instrument error as well as the error of
representation. While representation error is most commonly
associated with unresolved scales and processes, this term is
often considered to include contributions from pre-processing or
quality control and errors associated with the observation
operator. With a focus on practical operational implementation,
this chapter aims to define the components of observation error,
discusses their sources and characteristics, and provides an
overview of current methods for estimating observation error
statistics. We highlight the implicit assumptions of these
methods, as well as their shortcomings. We will detail current
operational practice for diagnosing observation error and
accounting for correlated observation error. Finally, we provide a
practical methodology for using these diagnostics, as well as the
associated innovation-based observation impact, to optimize the
assimilation of meteor radar observations in the upper
atmosphere.",
affiliation = "{U.S. Naval Research Laboratory} and {Met Office} and {U.S. Naval
Research Laboratory} and {U.S. Naval Research Laboratory} and
{U.S. Naval Research Laboratory} and {U.S. Naval Research
Laboratory} and {U.S. Naval Research Laboratory} and CPI and GATS
and GATS and GATS and {University of Saskatchewan} and {University
of Tromsų} and {University of Leipzig} and {University of Rostock}
and {University of Bath} and {Norwegian University of Science and
Technology} and {Chinese Academy of Sciences} and {University of
Western Ontario} and {University of Science and Technology of
China} and {China Research Institute of Radiowave Propagation} and
{Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)} and {The
University of Adelaide} and {Chungnam National University} and
{British Antarctic Survery} and {Australian Antarctic Division of
Sustainability} and {National Institute of Polar Research} and
{University of Colorado Boulder}",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-030-77722-7_8",
url = "http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-77722-7_8",
isbn = "9783030777227",
label = "lattes: 2306964700488382 28
SatterfieldWKHHEMMFISMHJLMELBYLRSMMTMB:2021:ApMeRa",
language = "en",
url = "https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-77722-7",
urlaccessdate = "05 maio 2024"
}