Close

1. Identity statement
Reference TypeConference Paper (Conference Proceedings)
Sitemtc-m16b.sid.inpe.br
Holder Codeisadg {BR SPINPE} ibi 8JMKD3MGPCW/3DT298S
Repositorydpi.inpe.br/ce@80/2007/01.12.14.26   (restricted access)
Last Update2007:04.09.20.24.56 (UTC) administrator
Metadata Repositorydpi.inpe.br/ce@80/2007/01.12.14.26.02
Metadata Last Update2018:06.05.03.33.44 (UTC) administrator
Citation KeyMendonca:2007:SyVeBr
TitleThe System Verification Breakdown Method
FormatPrint; CD-ROM; On-line.
Year2007
Access Date2024, Apr. 27
Secondary TypeCI
Number of Files3
Size2938 KiB
2. Context
AuthorMendonca, Cassio H.
AffiliationInstituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais - INPE
Author e-Mail Addresschmendonca1977@yahoo.com.br
EditorLoureiro, Geilson
Curran, Ricky
e-Mail Addresschmendonca1977@yahoo.com.br
Conference NameISPE International Conference on Concurrent Engineering, 14 (CE 2007).
Conference LocationSão José dos Campos
Date2007, July 16-20
PublisherInstituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)
Publisher CitySão José dos Campos
Pages63-70
Book TitleProceedings
OrganizationInstituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)
History (UTC)2007-02-26 15:39:17 :: chmendonca1977@yahoo.com.br -> ce2007 ::
2007-03-29 12:42:21 :: ce2007 -> chmendonca1977@yahoo.com.br ::
2007-04-09 20:37:43 :: chmendonca1977@yahoo.com.br -> ce2007 ::
2007-04-12 21:44:30 :: ce2007 -> administrator ::
2007-05-18 15:20:41 :: administrator -> ce2007 ::
2007-05-21 14:36:12 :: ce2007 -> administrator ::
2018-06-05 03:33:44 :: administrator -> marciana :: 2007
3. Content and structure
Is the master or a copy?is the master
Content Stagecompleted
Transferable1
Keywordsverification
method
block diagram
coverage tests
requirements
reuse
test cases generation
system
sub-system
interfaces
AbstractHigh integrated and complex systems are more and more scattered and common in people lives. Even without the exact feeling of this means, they hope for the best product. This desire implicate in system manufactures improve knowledgement and create solutions with more advanced technologies to satisfy consumers expectations. No much time ago, world saw the emergence of cell phones. In that time this technology was expansive and it was not so good, for instance, the coverage of signal was not so spread, batteries had no longer charge duration, displays only show the phone numbers and they have a nickname of "brick" because the excessive weight and size. Compare that with actual cell phones. Anyone can go to shop and buy a small one with voice recorder, integrated camera, internet access, expansible memories, among other features. It is only one brief and single example to demonstrate how the integrated system comes up in our lives and it could be replaced by video games, automobiles, domestics equipments, personal cares, computers, medicine among others. Manufacturers of high integrated systems need ensure that products will not cause problems to health or lives during them normal and abnormal operation and, of course, they must execute the desired work. The process to ensure correct implementation and development called System Verification. Verification have been done at the end of process development, but it have resulted in difficulties to manufacturers because is very expansive and hard to implement any required modifications at the end of development process. Thus, many manufactures have started verification process at begin of development, decreasing erroneous implementations. The usual way to advance verification tests is create mathematical models and simulate them in computers to verify normal and abnormal behavior. This is very useful during system development, but there are any problems that should be considerate: Which tests cases should be performed in models? Does the model have enough feature and functionalities implemented? Are the tests results as expected? A good approach to answer these questions is creating test cases procedures to know if models satisfy required necessities. But, how do create tests procedures without know completely the system under tests? At begin of development process, engineers write system description and system requirements thus, tests procedures should be done against these documents. This paper is intended to show an intuitive method possible to apply in any cases, using block diagrams, that assists generate test cases procedures, since when development starts, making relationship among system interfaces, subsystems and functions, enabling tests traceability and tests coverage analysis. In cases where manufacturer develops same kind of products, the block diagram will be easily reused to a new one, including or removing systems, subsystems and functions, adapting it to new features and project requirements.
AreaETES
TypeSystems Engineering
doc Directory Contentaccess
source Directory Content
theVerificationBreakdownMethod_CassioHMendonça.pdf 26/02/2007 12:38 424.2 KiB 
agreement Directory Contentthere are no files
4. Conditions of access and use
Languageen
Target Filepaper.pdf
User Groupadministrator
chmendonca1977@yahoo.com.br
administrator
Visibilityshown
Read Permissiondeny from all and allow from 150.163
5. Allied materials
Host Collectionlcp.inpe.br/ignes/2004/02.12.18.39
cptec.inpe.br/walmeida/2003/04.25.17.12
6. Notes
Mark1
Empty Fieldsarchivingpolicy archivist callnumber contenttype copyholder copyright creatorhistory descriptionlevel dissemination documentstage doi edition group identifier isbn issn label lineage mirrorrepository nextedition nexthigherunit notes numberofvolumes orcid parameterlist parentrepositories previousedition previouslowerunit progress project readergroup resumeid rightsholder schedulinginformation secondarydate secondarykey secondarymark serieseditor shorttitle sponsor tertiarymark tertiarytype url versiontype volume
7. Description control
e-Mail (login)marciana
update 


Close