Close

1. Identity statement
Reference TypeConference Paper (Conference Proceedings)
Sitemtc-m16b.sid.inpe.br
Holder Codeisadg {BR SPINPE} ibi 8JMKD3MGPCW/3DT298S
Repositorydpi.inpe.br/ce@80/2007/01.22.14.04   (restricted access)
Last Update2007:04.05.12.10.14 (UTC) administrator
Metadata Repositorydpi.inpe.br/ce@80/2007/01.22.14.04.39
Metadata Last Update2018:06.05.03.33.47 (UTC) administrator
Citation KeyCiechanowskiMaliNowa:2007:DFPlLi
TitleDFX Platform for life-cycle aspects analysis
FormatPrint; CD-ROM; On-line.
Year2007
Access Date2024, Apr. 28
Secondary TypeCI
Number of Files3
Size1992 KiB
2. Context
Author1 Ciechanowski, Piotr
2 Malinowski, Lukasz
3 Nowak, Tomasz
Affiliation1 ABB Corporate Research, Poland
2 ABB Corporate Research, Poland
3 ABB Corporate Research, Poland
Author e-Mail Address1 piotr.ciechanowski@pl.abb.com
2 lukasz.malinowski@pl.abb.com
3 tomasz.nowak@pl.abb.com
EditorLoureiro, Geilson
Curran, Ricky
e-Mail Addresspiotr.ciechanowski@pl.abb.com
Conference NameISPE International Conference on Concurrent Engineering, 14 (CE 2007).
Conference LocationSão José dos Campos
Date2007, July 16-20
PublisherInstituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)
Publisher CitySão José dos Campos
Pages274-281
Book TitleProceedings
OrganizationInstituto Nacional de Pesquisas Espaciais (INPE)
History (UTC)2007-03-29 10:53:54 :: piotr.ciechanowski@pl.abb.com -> ce2007 ::
2007-03-30 21:04:59 :: ce2007 -> piotr.ciechanowski@pl.abb.com ::
2007-04-05 07:32:37 :: piotr.ciechanowski@pl.abb.com -> ce2007 ::
2007-04-12 21:44:27 :: ce2007 -> administrator ::
2007-05-18 15:21:32 :: administrator -> ce2007 ::
2007-05-21 19:34:47 :: ce2007 -> administrator ::
2007-12-04 15:46:00 :: administrator -> piotr.ciechanowski@pl.abb.com ::
2007-12-04 19:49:58 :: piotr.ciechanowski@pl.abb.com -> administrator ::
2018-06-05 03:33:47 :: administrator -> marciana :: 2007
3. Content and structure
Is the master or a copy?is the master
Content Stagecompleted
Transferable1
Keywords. DFX
measures of DFX
life cycle
cost/benefit model
AbstractOBJECTIVES: Design for X is commonly regarded as a systematic and proactive designing of products to optimize total benefits over the whole product life-cycle, while meeting target quality, cost, performance and time-to-market. DFX involves, different methodologies for product design and optimization, providing useful results, however, they address only specific aspects of product life-cycle. In addition, various perspectives for business economics can often drive to contradicted conclusions. Since different approaches use different measures for concept design evaluation the comparisons are often problematic. In this context, the need for general, but unified view on design concepts evaluation is evident. As an answer, the DFX Platform - a holistic approach for design trade-offs analysis is proposed. In the paper the main concept of DFX Platform is explained first, overall architecture of the solution is presented and the unified model for total benefit analysis is described. METHODS: Existing methods for implementing the DFX generally do not offer quantitative measure of total profitability analysis. The key issue of this research was to develop the means to reliably estimate and verify the costs/benefits of different design concepts. Various design approaches, X-s, are collected and offered via DFX Platform. The role of this framework is to provide a structured workflow specifying how and when the different X methodologies can be applied, and also to unify DFX measures. The proposed solution consists of three basic architecture layers: Approaches, Inputs/Outputs and Metrics (measures). The most common Approaches are: Modularization, Standardization, Manufacturability Assemblability, Late Customization and Quality. Application of the dedicated design approach is controlled by the DFX framework, which invokes given tools, depending on the stage of product development. It also ensures that said approaches evaluate the design concepts in terms of cost, time and quality. The particular economic estimations and measures are transferred to Metrics domain, where the total cost/benefit model is constructed, and the present value of net benefit is calculated as the main rational measure of DFX. The intermediate technical results and proposals are transmitted to the Inputs/Outputs layer, where they are accessible by next analyses as input information. RESULTS: Based on the proposed framework, the DFX Platform was developed. The solution was designed as an engineering database, which manages the different design approaches, controls the application of specific tools according to the phase of the development process, transfers the information between and within domains and ensures consistency of cost/benefit estimations. The Platform was already applied to a few product development projects carried out within cross-bordered manufacturing company, and showed its big positive impact on projects and their results. KEY CONCLUSIONS: Todays DFX methods and tools (software packages, manufacturing guidelines, check sheets, etc.) consider product and process design in unilateral way mainly, e.g. manufacture- or assembly centric. This research proposed the framework, which involves trade-offs between different design objectives and business profitability measured by present value of net benefit. The practical system supporting proactive, profit oriented design, was developed and successfully applied to the real product development projects.
AreaETES
TypeCollaborative concurrent engineering methodologies, methods and tools
doc Directory Contentaccess
source Directory Content
paper.pdf 29/03/2007 07:53 446.5 KiB 
agreement Directory Contentthere are no files
4. Conditions of access and use
Languageen
Target Filepaper.pdf
User Groupadministrator
piotr.ciechanowski@pl.abb.com
administrator
Visibilityshown
Read Permissiondeny from all and allow from 150.163
5. Allied materials
Host Collectionlcp.inpe.br/ignes/2004/02.12.18.39
cptec.inpe.br/walmeida/2003/04.25.17.12
6. Notes
Mark1
Empty Fieldsarchivingpolicy archivist callnumber contenttype copyholder copyright creatorhistory descriptionlevel dissemination documentstage doi edition group identifier isbn issn label lineage mirrorrepository nextedition nexthigherunit notes numberofvolumes orcid parameterlist parentrepositories previousedition previouslowerunit progress project readergroup resumeid rightsholder schedulinginformation secondarydate secondarykey secondarymark serieseditor shorttitle sponsor tertiarymark tertiarytype url versiontype volume
7. Description control
e-Mail (login)marciana
update 


Close